AgBioChatter is a private email listserver used by the agrichemical industry and its allies to coordinate messaging and lobbying activities. List members include pro-industry academics, senior agrichemical industry staff and public relations operatives.
This internal Monsanto document identifies “Academics (AgBioChatter)” as a Tier 2 “industry partner” in Monsanto’s public relations plan to discredit the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), in order to protect the reputation of Roundup weedkiller. In March 2015, IARC judged glyphosate, the key ingredient in Roundup, to be probably carcinogenic to humans.
Several AgBioChatter academics also play key roles in other “industry partner” groups named in Monsanto’s PR plan to discredit the IARC carcinogenicity report, including GMO Answers, Biofortified, Genetic Literacy Project , Academics Review and Sense About Science.
Background: Monsanto Relied on These “Partners” to Attack Top Cancer Scientists
The AgBioChatter emails linked below – along with other documents obtained by U.S. Right to Know and now hosted at the UCSF Chemical Industry Documents Archive – provide many examples of how academics and industry partner groups work together in covert ways to push industry-coordinated messaging across various platforms to manufacture doubt about the health and environmental risks of pesticides and GMOs.
Media outlets around the world have reported on these behind-the-scenes collaborations to promote industry views of science and oppose regulations.
AgBioChatter public records request
U.S. Right to Know obtained some AgBioChatter emails in 2016 and 2017 via a public records request.In July 2017, U.S. Right to Know sued the University of Florida for its failure to release requested public records involving the agrichemical industry and publicly funded professors, including documents from the AgBioChatter forum.
In March 2018, a Florida judge dismissed the case, stating that the AgBioChatter emails were “purely personal activity born out of (Kevin Folta’s) own self interest” and not public university business. For more information, see the court documents.
Related press coverage
- Freedom of the Press Foundation, “How corporations suppress disclosure of public records about themselves,” by Camille Fassett (2/27/18)
- New York Times article, “Food Industry Enlisted Academics in GMO labeling war, Emails Show,” by Eric Lipton; and email archive, “A Florida Professor Works with the Biotech Industry” (9/5/2015)
- Alternet, “Is something fishy going on between the University of Florida and the agrichemical industry? Consumers have a right to know,” by Daniel Ross, Alternet (2/13/18)
AgBioChatter list content
The AgBioChatter emails obtained via state public records requests (142 pages) show academics and agrichemical industry staff coordinating talking points to oppose GMO labeling, promote and defend GMOs and pesticides, discredit industry critics, and evade Freedom of Information Act requests for information about publicly funded professors.
A major theme of the emails (and in particular the role of list member Jay Byrne, a former director of corporate communications for Monsanto) was to identify critics of the agrichemical industry and opportunities to attack them. These included Mehmet Oz, Vandana Shiva, Don Huber, Consumers Union and others.
Another key theme in the AgBioChatter emails is the effort to frame scientific studies that raise concerns about risks of GMOs and pesticides as “agenda-driven,” while studies that report positively about agrichemical industry products are “pro science.”
Academic, industry collaboration
According to the emails received to date via public records requests, academics, agrichemical industry employees, consultants and PR operatives participated in the “Chatter” list.
Known participants are listed below along with their ties to other “industry partner” groups named in Monsanto’s PR plan to orchestrate an outcry against the IARC cancer panel. For more information about these groups, see our fact sheets:
- Academics Review: the making of an industry front group
- Biofortified and March Against Myths about Modification
- Genetic Literacy Project partners with Monsanto to promote GMOs
- GMO Answers is an industry-funded marketing website
- Sense About Science spins science for industry
Also noted below are ties to the American Council on Science and Health, a front group that receives corporate money to promote industry views of science and attack critics.
The links to the Genetic Literacy Project archives provide a sense of the common, repetitive messaging these front groups and academics use to promote GMOs and pesticides, try to discredit critics, argue for deregulation and oppose transparency efforts.
AgBioChatterlist members
Emails obtained via public records requests indicate that the following people were on the AgBioChatter listserver as of the dates in the emails.
Andrew Apel, agrichemical industry consultant and former editor of the biotech industry newsletter AgBiotech Reporter
Graham Brooks, Agricultural Economist, PG Economics Ltd, UK
- GMO Answers profile
- Reviewer, Academics Review organic attack report
- Genetic Literacy Project archives
Jay Byrne, former director of corporate communications for Monsanto; president of v-Fluence Interactive public relations firm
- Helped set up Academics Review as a Monsanto front group
- Worked with Monsanto to develop target list of GMO critics to attack
- Organized press event with Nobel Laureates to attack Greenpeace
Bruce Chassy, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Food Safety and Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- WBEZ investigation: Why didn’t this professor have to disclose GMO funding?
- Academics Review co-founder and director
- GMO Answers profile
- American Council on Science and Health board of advisors
- Genetic Literacy Project archives
Jon Entine, director of Genetic Literacy Project, Monsanto “industry partner”
- USRTK fact sheet: Jon Entine and Genetic Literacy Project spin chemical industry PR
- Authored book defending Syngenta’s pesticide atrazine, published by theAmerican Council on Science and Health, an industry front group that received funding fromSyngenta
- GMO Answers third party organization
Kevin Folta, PhD, Professor and Chairman, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida
- New York Times investigation: Food industry enlisted academics in GMO labeling war, emails show
- USRTK fact sheet on Kevin Folta
- GMO Answers ambassador
- Biofortified board member, 2015-2018
- Genetic Literacy Project archives
Val Giddings, PhD, industry consultant, former VP of the BIO trade association
- Senior fellow at Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (funded by pharmaceutical, wireless and agrichemical industry groups)
- Helped set up Academics Review as a Monsanto front group
- Genetic Literacy Project archives
Andy Hedgecock, DuPont Pioneer former director of scientific affairs
- GMO Answers featured expert
Drew Kershen, PhD, Emeritus Professor, University of Oklahoma, College of Law
- USRTK fact sheet about Drew Kershen
- GMO Answers ambassador
- Board member of Genetic Literacy Project and Science Literacy Project
- Academics Review secretary, 2016
- Reviewer, Academics Review organic attack report
- Genetic Literacy Project archives
Marcel Kuntz, PhD, research director at CNRS, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire Végétale, Grenoble, France
- Genetic Literacy Project archives
Chris Leaver, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Plant Science, University of Oxford
- Sense About Science advisory council
- Author of Sense About Science GMO report
Adrienne Massey, PhD, Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), managing director of science and regulatory affairs
- GMO Answers third-party organization
Robert McGregor, Policy Analyst, Prince Edward Island, Canada
Alan McHughen, PhD, University of California Riverside
- GMO Answers ambassador
- American Council on Science and Health board of advisors
- Genetic Literacy Project archives
Henry Miller, MD, fellow at Hoover Institution, former FDA office of biotechnology
- New York Times investigation revealed Miller published article in Forbes that was ghostwritten by Monsanto
- USRTK fact sheet on Henry Miller
- Genetic Literacy Project archives
Vivian Moses, PhD, Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King’s College London
- GMO Answers profile
- Sense About Science advisory council
- Author of Sense About Science GMO report
Piero Morandini, PhD, research assistant, University of Milan
Wayne Parrott, PhD, Professor, Crop Breeding and Genetics, University of Georgia
C.S. Prakash, PhD, Professor, Plant Genetics, Genomics and Biotechnology College of Agricultural, Environmental and Nutrition Sciences, Tuskegee University
- Established “AgBioWorld community” with Competitive Enterprise Institute
- American Council on Science and Health board of advisors
Cami Ryan, PhD, Monsanto, social sciences lead, regulatory policy and scientific affairs in Canada
Eric Sachs, PhD, Monsanto, environmental, social and economic platform lead
- GMO Answers profile
- Helped set up Academics Review as a front group to attack critics
Alison Van Eenennaam, PhD, Animal Genetics and Biotechnology Cooperative Extension Specialist, University of California, Davis
- GMO Answers profile
- Food Evolution propaganda film
Karl Haro von Mogel, PhD, Biofortified director of science and media
- USRTK fact sheet about Biofortified
- Food Evolution propaganda film
- Genetic Literacy Project archives
For more information about the findings of U.S. Right to Know and media coverage about collaborations between industry groups and academics on food issues, see our investigations page. U.S. Right to Know documents are also available in the Chemical Industry Documents Library hosted by the University of California, San Francisco.