U.S. Right to Know is a nonprofit investigative public health research and journalism group working globally to expose corporate wrongdoing and government failures that threaten our health, environment and food system. Since 2015, we have obtained, posted and reported on thousands of industry and government documents, including many acquired through judicial enforcement of open records laws.
Our investigations into the pesticide and ultra-processed food industries have been reported on worldwide, leading tothreeNew York Timesexposés; more than adozen articlesin the BMJ, one of the world’s leading medical journals; and16 co-authoredpeer-reviewed public health journal articles. Our team has also reported extensively on the origins of Covid-19 and high-risk virological research.
Findings of the U.S. Right to Know investigation by topic:
Coca-Cola Company > Glyphosate > Chemical Fact Sheets and Document Pages > Academics and Universities > Government Agencies > Industry PR and Front Groups > Disney Funded Food Research > Synthetic Biology > Reporters and Media > Reports > Right to Know Review Newsletter > FOIA and Disclosure > Biohazards and SARS-CoV-2
Coca-Cola Company
- See our academic page for academic studies involving Coke based on our documents.
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health: How Coca-Cola Shaped the International Congress on Physical Activity and Public Health: An Analysis of Email Exchanges between 2012 and 2014
- BMJ: Coca-Cola sought to shift blame for obesity by funding public health conferences, study reports
- Public Health Nutrition: Evaluating Coca-Cola’s attempts to influence public health ‘in their own words’: analysis of Coca-Cola emails with public health academics leading the Global Energy Balance Network
- BMJ: Coca-Cola’s work with academics was a “low point in history of public health”
- Daily Mail: Coca-Cola ‘paid scientists to downplay how sugary beverages fueled the obesity crisis between 2013-2015,’ medical journal study finds
- POPLab: Infiltrada en universidades, Coca Cola usó científicos para minimizar daño de refrescos en la salud, revelan correos
- IFLScience: Nonprofit Health Group Tried To Bury Funding From Coca-Cola, Study Says
- Science Times: Study Evaluates Coca-Cola’s Attempts to Influence Public Opinion on Sugary Beverages and Obesity
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health: Targeting Children and Their Mothers, Building Allies and Marginalising Opposition: An Analysis of Two Coca-Cola Public Relations Requests for Proposals
- Washington Post: Coca-Cola internal documents reveal efforts to sell to teens, despite obesity crisis
- BMJ: Coca-Cola marketing to children is a ‘serious public health concern,’ researchers warn
- CNN: Coke targeted teens by saying sugary drinks are healthy
- Axios: Coca-Cola ad campaign targeted teens as childhood obesity worsens
- Journal of Public Health Policy: “Always Read the Small Print”: a case study of commercial research funding, disclosure and agreements with Coca-Cola
- Discover: Study uncovers how Coca-Cola influences science research
- MedPage Today: Study: Coca-Cola doesn’t ‘walk its talk’ on research independence
- STAT: Study pulls back curtain on contracts between Coca-Cola and the researchers it funds
- Gizmodo: Coca-Cola Can Terminate Health Research It Funds, Investigation Finds
- Politico: Coca-Cola gained control over health research in return for funding, health journal says
- Le Monde: Comment Coca-Cola a bafoué ses promesses de transparence dans les contrats de recherche
- Inverse: University Records Reveal Coca-Cola’s Immense Power Over Health Research
- Philadelphia Inquirer: Coca-Cola’s research contracts allowed for quashing negative health findings, study finds
- BMJ: Coca-Cola Contracts Could Allow it to “Quash” Unfavourable Research
- Milbank Quarterly: Public Meets Private: Conversations Between Coca-Cola and the CDC
- Associated Press: Limit Food Industry Sway on Public Health Matters
- The Washington Post: Coca-Cola Emails Reveal How Soda Industry Tries to Influence Health Officials
- BMJ: Coca-Cola and Obesity: Study Shows Efforts to Influence US Centers for Disease Control
- Coca-Cola emails with the CDC are posted in the U.S. Right to Know Food Industry Collection in the UCSF Food Industry Documents Library
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health: Science organisations and Coca-Cola’s ‘war’ with the public health community: insights from an internal industry document
- New York Times: New C.D.C. Chief Saw Coca-Cola as Ally in Obesity Fight
- Bloomberg: Emails Show How Food Industry Uses ‘Science’ to Push Soda
- Critical Public Health: How food companies influence evidence and opinion – straight from the horse’s mouth
- BMJ: US public health agency sued over failure to release emails from Coca-Cola
- BMJ: Coca-Cola’s Secret Influence on Medical and Science Journalists
- BMJ: Conflicts of Interest Compromise US Public Health Agency Mission, Scientists Say
- Journal of Public Health Policy: Complexity and conflicts of interest statements: a case-study of emails exchanged between Coca-Cola and the principal investigators of the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE)
- The Intercept: Trump’s New CDC Chief Championed Partnership with Coca Cola to Solve Childhood Obesity
- Forbes: The Coca-Cola Network: Soda Giant Mines Connections with Officials and Scientists to Wield Influence
- Forbes: Trump’s Pick to Head CDC Partnered With Coke, Boosting Agency’s Longstanding Ties to Soda Giant
- Environmental Health News: Coca-Cola’s ‘war’ with the public health community
- Health News Review: Internal documents show Coke had profits in mind when it funded nutrition ‘science’
- EcoWatch: Coca-Cola Sees Public Health Debate as ‘a Growing War,’ Documents Reveal
- USRTK short report: Journalists Fail to Reveal Sources Funded by Coca-Cola
USRTK news releases
- Coca-Cola Front Group Tried to Obscure Coke’s Funding & Key Role, Study Says (8.3.20)
- Coke PR Campaigns Tried to Influence Teens’ Views on Health Impacts of Soda, Study Says (12.18.19)
- Coca-Cola Can Bury Adverse Findings from Health Research It Funds, Study Says (5.7.19)
- Study Shows Coca-Cola’s Efforts to Influence CDC on Diet and Obesity (1.29.19)
- Study: How Coca-Cola Declared War on the Public Health Community (3.14.2018)
- U.S. Right to Know Sues CDC for Documents about its Ties to Coca-Cola (2.21.18)
- Study: How the Food Industry Sees Science, Public Health and Medical Organizations (9.13.17)
- BMJ Reveals Secret Industry Funding, based on USRTK documents (4.5.17)
- Did 24 Coke-Funded Studies on Childhood Obesity Fail to Disclose Coke’s Influence? (12.11.17)
Coke’s Influence at U.S. Centers for Disease Control
- BMJ: US public health agency is sued over failure to release emails from Coca-Cola
- New York Times: New C.D.C. Chief Saw Coca-Cola as Ally in Obesity Fight
- BMJ: Conflicts of interest compromise US public health agency’s mission, say scientists
- The Intercept: Trump’s New CDC Chief Championed Partnership with Coca-Cola to Solve Childhood Obesity
- Forbes: The Coca-Cola Network: Soda Giant Mines Connections with Officials and Scientists to Wield Influence
- Forbes: Trump’s Pick to Head CDC Partnered With Coke, Boosting Agency’s Longstanding Ties to Soda Giant
- USRTK: Top scientists at CDC complain of corporate influence, unethical practices
- San Diego Union Tribune: UCSD Hires Coke-Funded Health Researcher
- The Hill: What is Going On at CDC? Health Agency Needs Scrutiny
- USRTK: ILSI Wields Stealthy Influence for the Food and Agrichemical Industries
- USRTK: More Coca-Cola Ties Seen Inside USCenters for Disease Control
- USRTK: CDC Official Exits Agency After Coca-Cola Connections Come to Light
- USRTK: Beverage Industry Finds Friend Inside U.S. Health Agency
- USRTK news release: U.S. Right to Know Sues CDC for Documents about its Ties to Coca-Cola
Chemical Fact Sheets and Document Pages
- Aspartame: Decades of Science Point to Serious Health Risks
- Aspartame is Tied to Weight Gain, Increased Appetite and Obesity
- Sucralose: Emerging Science Reveals Health Risks
- PFAS: Health Concerns and Efforts to Regulate “Forever Chemicals”
- 2,4-D: Concerns about Cancer and Other Serious Illnesses
- Dicamba Fact Sheet
- Glyphosate: Cancer and Other Health Concerns
- Chlorpyrifos: Common pesticide tied to brain damage in children
- Fact sheet: EPA exposed for hiding chemical risks, favoring corporate interests
Documents and trial updates
- Monsanto Papers documents from glyphosate/Roundup cancer trials
- Dicamba Papers documents from litigation over dicamba drift
- Roundup and Dicamba Trial Tracker blog with regular trial updates
- Paraquat Papers documents from litigation on Parkinson’s disease
- Paraquat Trial Tracker updates from trials
- UCSF Food and Chemical Industry Libraries Host U.S. Right to Know Documents
Glyphosate Reporting
- Monsanto Papers and Monsanto Roundup Trial Tracker
- Carey Gillam’s reporting in The Guardian
- Undark Magazine: Decades of Deceit: Corporate-Spun Science Should Not Be Guiding Policy
- Journal of Public Health Policy: Roundup litigation discovery documents: implications for public health and journal ethics
- Le Monde: Monsanto Papers investigative series (winner of the European Press Prize)
- Environmental Health News: A story behind the Monsanto cancer trial – journal sits on retraction
- Environmental Health News: Corporate power, not public interest, at root of science committee hearing on IARC
- Truth Out: Secret Documents Expose Monsanto’s War on Cancer Scientists
- In These Times: Monsanto’s Toxic Legacy: An Investigative Reporter Talks Glyphosate
- USRTK: Reuters’ Kate Kelland Promotes False Narrative About IARC and Glyphosate Cancer Concerns
- USRTK: Carey Gillam Launches Book on Pesticide Problems and Monsanto Influence; Called to Appear Before European Parliament Joint Committee
- Presentation to European Parliament: Decades of Deceit: Revelations from the Monsanto Papers, Other Research
- The Nation: Did Monsanto Ignore Evidence Linking its Weed Killer to Cancer?
- Environmental Health News: Weed Killer for Breakfast
- Civil Eats: Reporting on the World’s Most Controversial Farm Chemical
- EcoWatch: Monsanto’s ‘Jaw-Dropping’ Deception Exposed in ‘Whitewash’
- USRTK: How Monsanto Manufactured Outrage at IARC Over Cancer Classification
- EcoWatch: Internal EPA Docs Show Scramble for Data on Monsanto’s Roundup
- Huffington Post: New Monsanto Papers Add to Questions of Regulatory Collusion, Scientific Mischief
- FAIR: Reuters vs. UN Cancer Agency: Are Corporate Ties Influencing Science Coverage?
- USRTK: Reuters’ Kate Kelland IARC Story Promotes False Narrative
- Huffington Post: Moms Exposed to Monsanto Weed Killer Means Bad Outcomes for Babies
- Huffington Post: USDA Drops Plans to Test for Monsanto Weed Killer in Food
- USRTK fact sheet: Glyphosate: Health Concerns About the Most Widely Used Pesticide
- Huffington Post: Monsanto Weed Killer Deserves Deeper Scrutiny as Scientific Manipulation Revealed
- USRTK: Questions about Monsanto, EPA Collusion Raised in Cancer Lawsuits
- Huffington Post: Monsanto’s Mind Meld; Spin Machine in High Gear
- USRTK: Monsanto and EPA Want to Keep Talks Secret on Glyphosate Cancer Review
- The Hill: Serious Scrutiny Needed a EPA Seeks Input on Cancer Ties to Monsanto Herbicide
- USRTK: New Data on Pesticides in Food Raises Safety Questions
- USRTK: FDA Suspends Testing for Glyphosate in Food
- USRTK:More Bad News for Honey as US Seeks to Get Handle on Glyphosate Residues in Food
- The Hill: Bully Monsanto Attacks Scientists Who Link Glyphosate and Cancer
- Huffington Post: EPA Bows to Chemical Industry Pressure in Glyphosate Review
- USRTK: Upcoming EPA Meetings On Glyphosate Drawing Scrutiny
- USRTK: FDA Tests Confirm Oatmeal, Baby Food Contain Monsanto Weedkiller
- Huffington Post: USRTK Investigation Reveals FDA Found Glyphosate in Honey
- USRTK: Glyphosate Revolution is Growing, and Consumers Want Answers
- Le Monde: La discrete influence de Monsanto
- Guardian: UN/WHO Panel in Conflict of Interest Row over Glyphosate Cancer Risk
- Die Zeit: Glyphosat: Möglicher Interessenskon flikt bei Pflanzenschutzmittel-Bewertung
- Horticulture Week: Questions Raised Over Independence of Panel that Found Glyphosate Safe
- ARD: Experten werfen Fachgremium Wirtschaftsnähe vor
- USRTK: Conflicts of Interest Concerns Cloud Glyphosate Review
- USRTK news release: FDA Plan to Measure Weed Killer Residues Only a First Step
- USRTK news release: USDA Avoids Analyzing Glyphosate in Food Residues for Annual Report
Academics and Universities Linked to Corporations
Our investigation has uncovered secret financial arrangements and close collaborations between corporations, their PR firms and supposedly “independent” academics who promote corporate interests. These revelations were first covered in a front-page story in The New York Times by two-time Pulitzer Prize winner Eric Lipton.
Kevin Folta, University of Florida
- New York Times: Food Industry Enlisted Academics in GMO Labeling War
- Emails posted by The New York Times
- Documents detailing chemical industry funding to the University of Florida
- USRTK Fact Sheet: The Misleading and Deceitful Ways of Kevin Folta
- The Progressive: Flacking for GMOs: How the Biotech Industry Cultivates Positive Media
- Huffington Post: Keith Kloor’s Enduring Love Affair with GMOs
- USRTK Fact Sheet: Keith Kloor: The Agrichemical Industry’s Favorite Writer
- Mother Jones: These Emails Show Monsanto Leaning on Professors to Fight the GMO PR War
- Nature Biotechnology: Standing up for Transparency
- Global News: Documents Reveal Canadian Teenager Target of GMO Lobby
- Freedom of the Press Foundation: How corporations suppress disclosure of public records about themselves
- USRTK Short Report: Journalists Failed to Disclose Sources’ Funding from Monsanto
- Independent Science News: The Puppetmasters of Academia
- USRTK letter to Professor Folta about our FOIA requests
Bruce Chassy, University of Illinois
- USRTK Fact Sheet: Academics Review: The Making of a Monsanto Front Group
- WBEZ: Why Didn’t an Illinois Professor Have to Disclose GMO Funding?
- The Progressive: Flacking for GMOs: How the Biotech Industry Cultivates Positive Media
- Huffington Post: Monsanto’s Fingerprints Found All Over Attack on Organic Food
- USRTK: Following an Email Trail: How a Public University Professor Collaborated on a Corporate PR Campaign
- USRTK News Release: New Documents Uncover Monsanto’s Secret Role in Bruce Chassy’s Academics Review
- Mother Jones: Emails Show Monsanto Leaning on Professors to Fight the GMO PR War
- New York Times: Food Industry Enlisted Academics in GMO Labeling War
- Chassy emails posted by The New York Times
- Retraction Watch: Unearthed Emails: Monsanto Connected to Campaign to Retract GMO Paper
- USRTK Short Report: Journalists Failed to Disclose Sources’ Funding from Monsanto
Jon Entine, Genetic Literacy Project, former visiting fellow UC Davis
- USRTK Fact Sheet: Jon Entine, Genetic Literacy Project: Messengers for Monsanto/Bayer and the Chemical Industry
- The Progressive: Flacking for GMOs: How the Biotech Industry Cultivates Positive Media
- USRTK Fact Sheet: Biotech Literacy Project boot camps
- USRTK Fact Sheet: Monsanto Relied on These ‘Partners’ to Attack Cancer Scientists
- Truth Out: Secret Documents Expose Monsanto’s War on Cancer Scientists
- Le Monde: Monsanto Papers: The Battle for Information and Operation Intoxication
- The Ecologist: ‘Pro Science’ GMO, Chemical Pushers Funded by Climate Science Deniers
- USRTK News Release: Group Calls on Jon Entine to Reveal Funding Ties to Industry
- Bloomberg: How Monsanto Mobilized Academics to Pen Articles Supporting GMO
- USRTK: Journalists Mentioned in Our FOIA Requests
- Polluter Watch: Jon Entine
Cornell Alliance for Science & Gates Foundation
- Fact Sheet: Critiques of Gates Foundation agricultural interventions in Africa
- Bill Gates Food Tracker: Blog with reporting on Gates Foundation agricultural interventions
- Fact Sheet: Gates-Funded Cornell Alliance for Science is a PR Campaign for the Agrichemical Industry
- Fact Sheet: Mark Lynas Promotes the Agrichemical Industry’s Commercial Agenda
- USRTK: Gates Foundation doubles down on misinformation at Cornell as African leaders call for agroecology
- The Ecologist: Gates Foundation’s failing green revolution in Africa
- The Ecologist: Why is Cornell University Hosting a GMO Propaganda Campaign?
- The Ecologist: Bill Gates: Can We Have an Honest Conversation about GMOs?
- USRTK News Release: Gates Foundation Funds GMO Propaganda Campaign at Cornell
- Fact Sheet: Cornell Fellow Trevor Butterworth Spins Science for Chemical, Food Industries
Trevor Butterworth, Sense About Science USA, Cornell Alliance for Science
- USRTK Fact Sheet: Trevor Butterworth Spins Science for Industry
- USRTK Fact Sheet: Cornell Alliance for Science is a PR Campaign for the Agrichemical Industry
- BMJ: Author’sreply, Coca Cola’s secret influence on medical and science journalists
- The Ecologist: ‘Pro Science’ GMO, Chemical Pushers Funded by Climate Science Deniers
Henry I. Miller, formerly Hoover Institution
- USRTK Fact Sheet: Henry Miller Dropped by Forbes for Ghostwriting Scandal
- Fact sheets on Henry Miller’s collaborators Julie Kelly and Kavin Senapathy
- Business Insider: The Future of Food Requires Transparency, Integrity
- USRTK: Monsanto Fingerprints All Over Miller’s Newsweek Attack on Organic Food
- Le Monde: Monsanto Papers: The Battle for Information
- The Ecologist: ‘Pro Science’ GMO, Chemical Pushers Funded by Climate Science Deniers
Keith Kloor, New York University
- USRTK Fact Sheet: Keith Kloor: The Agrichemical Industry’s Favorite Writer
- Huffington Post: Keith Kloor’s Enduring Love Affair with GMOs
- USRTK Short Report: Journalists Mentioned in Our FOIA Requests
- PolluterWatch: Keith Kloor
Drew Kershen,University of Oklahoma College of Law
- USRTK Fact Sheet: Drew Kershen: Agrichemical Industry Front Group Ringleader
Calestous Juma, Harvard University
- Boston Globe: Harvard Professor Failed to Disclose Monsanto Connection in GMO Paper
- Harvard Crimson: Prof Failed To Disclose Connection to Company in Paper
Alison Van Eenenaam, UC Davis
- USRTK fact sheet: Alison Van Eenennaam: Key Outside Spokesperson and Lobbyist for the Agrichemical Industry Industries
- See also Food Evolution propaganda film and Cornell Alliance for Science fact sheet
James Hill & John Peters, University of Colorado, Denver
- BMJ: Coca-Cola’s Secret Influence on Medical and Science Journalists
- USRTK news release: BMJ Reveals Secret Industry Funding, based on USRTK documents
- STAT: Disney, Fearing a Scandal, Tried to Press Journal to Withdraw Research Paper
- Orlando Sentinel: Disney Nutrition Study Underscores Controversy in Corporate-Funded Research
- USRTK Short Report: Journalists Fail to Reveal Sources Funded by Coca-Cola
Richard Goodman, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
- Le Monde: La Discrète Influence de Monsanto
- USRTK: Keeping Secrets from Consumers: Labeling Law a Win for Industry-Academic Collaborations
Peter Phillips, University of Saskatchewan
- USRTK fact sheet:Corporate influence at the University of Saskatchewan: Professor Peter Phillips and his secret “right to know symposium”
- The Sheaf: Lawsuit against university comes to an end, public shares concerns
- Briarpatch magazine: Group hopes courts will force U of S to release documents on ties to Monsanto
- CBC: U of S Defends Prof’s Monsanto Ties, But Some Faculty Disagree
- CBC: University of SaskatchewanProf Under Fire for Monsanto Ties
- Saskatoon Star Phoenix: Group Questions U of S Prof’s Monsanto Link
Stuart Smyth, University of Saskatchewan
- USRTK fact sheet: Stuart Smyth’s agrichemical industry ties and funding
David Shaw, Mississippi State University
- New York Times: Food Industry Enlisted Academics in GMO Labeling War
- Emails posted by the New York Times
Steven N. Blair, University of South Carolina
- USRTK Short Report: Journalists Fail to Reveal Sources Funded by Coca-Cola
Industry PR & Front Groups
U.S. Right to Know is tracking groups that collaborate with the agrichemical and food industries, often in covert ways, to promote industry products and political agendas.
- Tracking the Pesticide Industry Propaganda Network
- Academics Review: The Making of a Monsanto Front Group
- American Council on Science and Health is a corporate front group
- Biology Fortified, Inc. (Biofortified)
- BIO: biotech industry trade group
- Calorie Control Council
- Center for Consumer Freedom
- Center for Food Integrity: spin group funded by food and chemical industries
- Cornell Alliance for Science: Gates-funded propaganda campaign at Cornell
- Council for Biotechnology Information/ GMO Answers/ CropLife
- Crop Life International: pesticide industry trade group
- Food Evolution documentary is a propaganda film
- International Life Sciences Institute wields stealthy influence for food and chemical industries
- Independent Women’s Forum promotes pesticide, tobacco, oil agendas
- Genetic Literacy Project is a key messaging vehicle for the pesticide and GMO industry
- GMO Answers is a PR and marketing website funded by chemical companies
- Grocery Manufacturers Association
- International Food Information Council: trade group funded by food and chemical companies
- International Dairy Foods Association
- Ketchum PR Firmruns the agrichemical industry’s PR salvo on GMOs
- Monsanto named these ‘industry partners’ in its 2015 PR plan to discredit glyphosate cancer report
- Sense About Science/STATS lobbies for industry interests
- Science Media Centre spins corporate views of science
- U.S. Farmers and Ranchers Alliance
Fact sheets about writers and PR surrogates the agrichemical industry relies on to promote industry spin about science and regulations.
- Jon Entine is the Chemical Industry’s Master Messenger
- Drew Kershen: Agrichemical Industry Front Group Ringleader
- Alison Van Eenennaam: Key outside spokesperson, lobbyist for agrichemical and GMO industries
- Keith Kloor: the Agrichemical Industry’s Favorite Writer
- Mark Lynas Promotes the Agrichemical Industry’s Commercial Agenda
- Hank Campbell’s Maze of Monsanto-Loving Websites (ACSH, Science 2.0, ScienceBlogs)
- Why Forbes Dropped Henry I. Miller
- Why Forbes Deleted Some Kavin Senapathy Articles
- Julie Kelly Cooks up Propaganda for the Chemical Industry
- Trevor Butterworth Spins Science for Industry
- Julie Gunlock and Koch Funded IWF Promote Pesticide Agenda
- SciBabe says eat your pesticides and junk food. But who is paying her?
- Stuart Smyth and Peter Phillips at the University of Saskatchewan
American Council on Scienceand Health (ACSH)
- USRTK fact sheet: Why You Can’t Trust the American Council on Science and Health
- Hank Campbell’s Maze of Monsanto-Loving Websites (ACSH, Science 2.0, ScienceBlogs)
- FAIR: USA Today and Newsweek need standards for opinion writers
- The Progressive: Flacking for GMOs: How the Biotech Industry Cultivates Positive Media
- Le Monde:Opération intoxication : les réseaux de Monsanto
- News Release: Public Interests Groups to USA Today: Ditch Columns by ACSH
- Alternet: USA Today Fail: Trump Science Article Written by Corporate Front Group
GMO Answers
- USRTK: The GMO Industry Doesn’t Want You To See This Video
- USRTK fact sheet: GMO Answers is a Marketing and PR Website for GMO Companies
- USRTK fact sheet: Monsanto Relied on These ‘Partners’ to Attack Top Cancer Scientists
- USRTK news release: US Right to Know FOIA’s Profs Who Wrote for GMO PR Website
International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI)
- See our Academic Work for journal articles on ILSI co-authored by U.S. Right to Know
- New York Times: A Shadowy Industry Group Shapes Food Policy Around the World
- BMJ: International Life Sciences Institute is advocate for food and drink industry, say researchers
- BMJ: Food and drink industry sought to influence scientists and academics, emails show
- POPLab: ILSI: Seudociencia para lavar la cara a la pandemia de alimentos chatarra
- Guardian: Science institute that advised EU and UN ‘actually industry lobby group, by Arthur Neslen
- Bloomberg: Emails Show How Food Industry Uses ‘Science’ to Push Soda
- Critical Public Health: How Food Companies Influence Evidence and Opinion
- Guardian: UN/WHO Panel in Conflict of Interest Row over Glyphosate Cancer Risk
- The Hill: What is Going On at CDC? Health Agency Needs Scrutiny
- USRTK: More Coca-Cola Ties Seen Inside USCenters for Disease Control
- USRTK: CDC Official Exits Agency After Coca-Cola Connections Come to Light
- USRTK: Beverage Industry Finds Friend Inside U.S. Health Agency
- FAIR: Reuters Vs. UN Cancer Agency: Are Corporate Ties Influencing Science Coverage?
- Fact Sheet: ILSI Wields Stealthy Influence for the Food and Agrichemical Industries
- Die Zeit: Glyphosat:Möglicher Interessenskonflikt bei Pflanzenschutzmittel-Bewertung
- Horticulture Week: Questions Raised Over Independence of Panel that Found Glyphosate Safe
- ARD: Experten werfen Fachgremium Wirtschaftsnähe vor
- USRTK: Conflicts of Interest Concerns Cloud Glyphosate Review
Ketchum PR
- USRTK fact sheet: Ketchum: The Agrichemical Industry’s PR Firm
- Video: Ketchum Brags How it Spins the Media on GMO Issues
- Huffington Post: Ketchum PR Firm Attacks Organic Food, Then Pitches Itself to Organic Companies
Monsanto’s PR partners
- USRTK fact sheet: Monsanto relied on these ‘partners’ to attack IARC/WHO cancer panel
- Truth Out: Secret documents reveal Monsanto’s war on cancer scientists
Government Agencies
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- New York Times: New C.D.C. Chief Saw Coca-Cola as Ally in Obesity Fight
- USRTK news release: U.S. Right to Know Sues CDC for Documents about its Ties to Coca-Cola
- The Intercept: Trump’s New CDC Chief Championed Partnership with Coca Cola to Solve Childhood Obesity
- Forbes: The Coca-Cola Network: Soda Giant Mines Connections with Officials and Scientists to Wield Influence
- Forbes: Trump’s Pick to Head CDC Partnered With Coke, Boosting Agency’s Longstanding Ties to Soda Giant
- BMJ: Conflicts of interest compromise US public health agency’s mission, say scientists
- USRTK: Scientists Lodge Ethics Complaint Over Corporate Influence at CDC
- The Hill: What is Going on at the CDC? Health Agency Ethics Need Scrutiny
- USRTK: More Coca-Cola Ties Seen Inside US Centers for Disease Control
- USRTK: CDC Official Exits Agency After Coca-Cola Connections Come to Light
- USRTK: Beverage Industry Finds Friend Inside U.S. Health Agency
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- The Guardian: Weedkiller Found in Granola and Crackers, Internal FDA Emails Show
- USRTK: New Data on Pesticides in Food Raises Safety Questions
- USRTK: FDA Suspends Testing for Glyphosate in Food
- USRTK:More Bad News for Honey as US Seeks to Get Handle on Glyphosate Residues in Food
- USRTK: FDA Tests Confirm Oatmeal, Baby Foods Contain Residues of Monsanto’s Weedkiller
- USRTK: FOIA Documents Reveal FDA Found Monsanto Weedkiller in U.S. Honey Samples
- The Hill: How U.S. Government Agencies Cheat the Public on FOIA
- USRTK news release: FDA Plan to Measure Weed Killer Residues Only a First Step
U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Huffington Post: USDA Drops Plans to Test for Monsanto Weed Killer in Food
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- USRTK: MDL Monsanto Glyphosate Cancer Case Key Documents and Analysis
- EcoWatch: Internal EPA Docs Show Scramble for Data on Monsanto’s Roundup
- Huffington Post: New Monsanto Papers Add to Questions of Regulatory Collusion, Scientific Mischief
- Huffington Post: Monsanto Weed Killer Deserves Deeper Scrutiny as Scientific Manipulation Revealed
- USRTK: Questions about Monsanto, EPA Collusion Raised in Cancer Lawsuits
- USRTK: Monsanto and EPA Want to Keep Talks Secret on Glyphosate Cancer Review
- The Hill: Serious Scrutiny Needed a EPA Seeks Input on Cancer Ties to Monsanto Herbicide
- USRTK: EPA Bows to Chemical Industry Pressure in Glyphosate Review
- USRTK: Upcoming EPA Meetings On Glyphosate Drawing Scrutiny
Disney Corporate Funded Food Research
- STAT: Disney, Fearing a Scandal, Tried to Press Journal to Withdraw Research Paper
- Orlando Sentinel: Disney Nutrition Study Underscores Controversy in Corporate-Funded Research
- Inverse: Disney Parks Study Shows Problems with Corporate Science, Not Hot Dogs
- Marion Nestle: Strange story of my accepted but yet-to-be-published commentary on Disney-sponsored study gets stranger
Synthetic Biology / Gene Editing
- USRTK: Bill Gates’ radical menu for food systems: ultra-processed foods, patents, monocrops
- USRTK: Is Cargill’s new stevia plant the ‘farm’ of the future?
- USRTK: Cargill’s Stevia Hoodwinks Consumers
- EcoWatch: Impossible Burger and the road to consumer distrust
- Common Ground magazine: Are you ready for the new wave of genetically engineered foods?
- Huffington Post: GMOs 2.0 Coming Your Way: Will They Be Labeled? Q&A with Consumers Union Senior Scientist Michael Hansen on synthetic biology, GMOs 2.0, labeling and the future of food
- Huffington Post: Meet the New Stevia: Synthetic Biology GMOs 2.0 Get Dressed for Success
Journalists and Media
- The Progressive: Flacking for GMOs: How the Biotech Industry Cultivates Positive Media
- BMJ: Coca-Cola’s secret influence on medical and science journalists
- USRTK press release: BMJ reveals secret industry funding of reporting, based on USRTK documents
- USRTK: Journalists Fail to Reveal Sources Funded by Coca-Cola
- USRTK: Journalists Failed to Disclose Sources’ Funding From Monsanto
Keith Kloor
- USRTK fact sheet: Keith Kloor: the agrichemical industry’s favorite write
- Huffington Post: Keith Kloor’s Endearing Love Affair with GMOs: New York University’s adjunct journalism professor has curious ideas about science and journalism
- USRTK: Journalists Mentioned in our FOIA Requests
- Polluter Watch: Keith Kloor
Tamar Haspel (Washington Post)
- USRTK fact sheet: How Tamar Haspel misleads readers of the Washington Post
- The Progressive: Flacking for GMOs: How the Biotech Industry Cultivates Positive Media
- FAIR: Buckraking on the Food Beat: When Is It a Conflict of Interest?
- FAIR: Washington Post’s Food Columnist Goes to Bat for Monsanto
- USRTK: Journalists Mentioned in Our FOIA Requests
Kate Kelland (Reuters)
- USRTK: Reuters’ Kate Kelland Again Promotes False Narrative About IARC and Glyphosate Cancer Concerns
- FAIR: Reuters vs. UN Cancer Agency: Are Corporate Ties Influencing Science Coverage?
- USRTK: Reuters’ Kate Kelland IARC Story Promotes False Narrative
- Huffington Post: Monsanto’s Spin Doctors Target Cancer Scientist in Flawed Reuters Story
Jennifer Kahn (UC Berkeley, New York Times)
- USRTK: Jennifer Kahn’s ‘love GMOs’ NYT article is propaganda, not journalism
Amy Harmon (New York Times)
- USRTK: Journalists Mentioned in Our FOIA Requests
Reports
- Seedy Business: What Big Food is Hiding with its Slick PR Campaign on GMOs
- Spinning Food: How Food Industry Front Groups and Covert Communications are Shaping the Story of Food
Right to Know Review Newsletter
- Sign up for our newsletter to track the latest news and investigations from U.S. Right to Know
- Past issues of Right to Know Review
On Freedom of Information and Disclosure
USRTK FOIA page: Defending our right to know
Freedom of the Press Foundation: How corporations suppress disclosure of public records about themselves
The Hill: How Freedom Falls: Broken FOIA Far From Healing as US Agencies Cheat Public
Los Angeles Times: In Science, Follow the Money – If You Can
New York Times: Scientists, Give Up Your Emails
Nature Biotechnology: Standing Up for Transparency
Ralph Nader: Monsanto and its Promoters vs. Freedom of Information
SARS-CoV-2 and Biohazards Investigation
In 2020, U.S. Right to Know launched a biohazards investigation into the origins of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, and to research accidents, leaks and other mishaps at laboratories where pathogens of pandemic potential are stored and modified, and the health risks of gain-of-function (GOF) research. For more information.
- Biohazards blog: Our reporting on new documents obtained by U.S. Right to Know
- Documents page: Documents USRTK has obtained via Freedom of Information laws
- Background readings list: Did SARS-CoV-2 Originate in a Lab? What are the Risks of Gain-of-Function Research?
- Why we are researching the origins of SARS-CoV-2, biosafety labs and GOF research
U.S. Right to Know is a nonprofit organization that investigates the risks associated with the corporate food system, and the food industry’s practices and influence on public policy. We promote the free market principle of transparency iscrucial to building a better, healthier food system.
Please donate to support our work, and sign up to receive our newsletter for regular updates on our investigation.