bat coronavirus

Lab accident is ‘most likely but least probed’ COVID origin, State Dept. memo says

Print Email Share Tweet LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Telegram

State Department officials considered a lab accident to be the most likely cause of COVID-19 in the pandemic’s early months and worried that international virologists may help with a coverup, according to a 2020 memo obtained by U.S. Right to Know. “Origin of the outbreak: The Wuhan labs remained the most likely but least probed,” Lab accident is ‘most likely but least probed’ COVID origin, State Dept. memo says

Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci emailed about whether NIH funded Wuhan lab before secret call

Print Email Share Tweet LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Telegram

In the earliest days of the pandemic, Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins emailed about coronaviruses under study at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and about whether they had steered money to the lab, an email obtained by U.S. Right to Know shows. Collins, then leader of the National Institutes of Health, and Fauci, leader of Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci emailed about whether NIH funded Wuhan lab before secret call

How NIH-funded research in China could have led to the COVID-19 pandemic

Print Email Share Tweet LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Telegram

A multimillion-dollar bat coronavirus research grant, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), was made public last week, revealing that researchers based in Wuhan, China had manipulated coronaviruses in ways that led to increased severity of infection, employing platforms that tested the ability of bat coronaviruses to use human receptors. The grant documents underscore How NIH-funded research in China could have led to the COVID-19 pandemic

No peer review for addendum to prominent coronavirus origins study?

Print Email Share Tweet LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Telegram
Photo Credit: @BillyBostickson

The journal Nature did not assess the reliability of important claims made in a November 17 addendum to a study on the bat-origins of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, correspondence with Nature staff suggests. On February 3, 2020, Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists reported discovering the closest known relative of SARS-CoV-2, a bat coronavirus called RaTG13. No peer review for addendum to prominent coronavirus origins study?

Altered datasets raise more questions about reliability of key studies on coronavirus origins

Print Email Share Tweet LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Telegram

Revisions to genomic datasets associated with four key studies on coronavirus origins add further questions about the reliability of these studies, which provide foundational support for the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 originated in wildlife. The studies, Peng Zhou et al., Hong Zhou et al., Lam et al., and Xiao et al., discovered SARS-CoV-2-related coronaviruses in horseshoe Altered datasets raise more questions about reliability of key studies on coronavirus origins

Scientists who authored article denying lab engineering of SARS-CoV-2 privately acknowledged possible lab origin, emails show

Print Email Share Tweet LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Telegram

Four prominent U.S. virologists who published a widely cited commentary strongly rebutting the theory that SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, might have been engineered in a lab privately acknowledged that they could not “rule out the possibility” of a lab leak, according to emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know. The emails discuss Scientists who authored article denying lab engineering of SARS-CoV-2 privately acknowledged possible lab origin, emails show