zoonotic theory

No peer review for addendum to prominent coronavirus origins study?

Print Email Share Tweet LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Telegram
Photo Credit: @BillyBostickson

The journal Nature did not assess the reliability of important claims made in a November 17 addendum to a study on the bat-origins of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, correspondence with Nature staff suggests. On February 3, 2020, Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists reported discovering the closest known relative of SARS-CoV-2, a bat coronavirus called RaTG13. No peer review for addendum to prominent coronavirus origins study?

Validity of key studies on origin of coronavirus in doubt; science journals investigating

Print Email Share Tweet LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Telegram

By Carey Gillam Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in the Chinese city of Wuhan in December 2019, scientists have searched for clues about what led to the emergence of its causative agent, the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Uncovering the source of SARS-CoV-2 could be crucial for preventing future outbreaks. A series of four high profile studies Validity of key studies on origin of coronavirus in doubt; science journals investigating