Stacy Malkan, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, February 4, 2016
A few months ago, I raised concerns about Washington Post food columnist Tamar Haspel (FAIR.org,10/28/15) after she admitted taking money from agribusiness interest groups that she covers.
I pointed out that her columns are biased in favor of those industry groups, particularly on the topic of GMOs, even though her column is presented to readers as an unbiased effort to find middle ground in debates about our food system.
My article was met with crickets of silence from Haspel, her Post editor Joe Yonan and the band of biotech promoters who prolifically praise Haspel on Twitter. I figured that, soon enough, Haspel might write another column that would warrant raising the concerns another notch up the pole. She didn’t disappoint.
In her January column (Washington Post, 1/26/16), Haspel offered an investigation (“the surprising truth”) about the food movement—without speaking to anyone in the food movement—concluding that there isn’t much of a food movement after all, and most people don’t really care about labeling genetically engineered foods (GMOs).
Her sources? A two-year-old survey, another survey conducted by a food-industry front group, and consumer research by the agrichemical industry’s public relations firm. Let’s take a closer look.
Latest USRTK In the News
Coca-Cola’s “War” With the Public Health Community
Gary Ruskin, Environmental Health News, April 3, 2018
Internal Documents Show Coke Had Profits in Mind When It Funded Nutrition ‘Science’
Kathlyn Stone, Health News Review, March 28, 2018
Corruption of Science: Why Are Governments Not Banning Monsanto’s Roundup?
Sunita Narain, Business Standard, March 26, 2018
Un Estudio Desvela Cómo Coca-Cola Fundó un Instituto Científico Para Influir en el Debate Sobre la Obesidad
Miguel Ayuso, Directo al Paladar, March 16, 2018
Coca-Cola Sees Public Health Debate as ‘a Growing War,’ Documents Reveal
Olivia Rosane, EcoWatch, March 16, 2018