Stacy Malkan, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, February 4, 2016
A few months ago, I raised concerns about Washington Post food columnist Tamar Haspel (FAIR.org,10/28/15) after she admitted taking money from agribusiness interest groups that she covers.
I pointed out that her columns are biased in favor of those industry groups, particularly on the topic of GMOs, even though her column is presented to readers as an unbiased effort to find middle ground in debates about our food system.
My article was met with crickets of silence from Haspel, her Post editor Joe Yonan and the band of biotech promoters who prolifically praise Haspel on Twitter. I figured that, soon enough, Haspel might write another column that would warrant raising the concerns another notch up the pole. She didn’t disappoint.
In her January column (Washington Post, 1/26/16), Haspel offered an investigation (“the surprising truth”) about the food movement—without speaking to anyone in the food movement—concluding that there isn’t much of a food movement after all, and most people don’t really care about labeling genetically engineered foods (GMOs).
Her sources? A two-year-old survey, another survey conducted by a food-industry front group, and consumer research by the agrichemical industry’s public relations firm. Let’s take a closer look.
Latest USRTK In the News
How Lobbyists for Monsanto Led a ‘Grassroots Farmers’ Movement Against an EU Glyphosate Ban
Zach Boren and Arthur Neslen, Unearthed, October 17, 2018
Questions about Funding and Purpose Loom over a Foundation Congress Created to Help the FDA
Ike Swetlitz, STAT, October 9, 2018
Billion Dollar Losses Related to Roundup
Steve Curwood, Living on Earth, September 28, 2018
Did Monsanto Know Its Weed Killer Could Be Deadly to People?
Stuart Braun, dw.com, August 17, 2018
A Terminally Ill Man’s Victory Against Monsanto Could Spell Disaster for the Agrochemical Juggernaut
Stephanie K. Baer, BuzzFeed News, August 16, 2018