Stacy Malkan, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, February 4, 2016
A few months ago, I raised concerns about Washington Post food columnist Tamar Haspel (FAIR.org,10/28/15) after she admitted taking money from agribusiness interest groups that she covers.
I pointed out that her columns are biased in favor of those industry groups, particularly on the topic of GMOs, even though her column is presented to readers as an unbiased effort to find middle ground in debates about our food system.
My article was met with crickets of silence from Haspel, her Post editor Joe Yonan and the band of biotech promoters who prolifically praise Haspel on Twitter. I figured that, soon enough, Haspel might write another column that would warrant raising the concerns another notch up the pole. She didn’t disappoint.
In her January column (Washington Post, 1/26/16), Haspel offered an investigation (“the surprising truth”) about the food movement—without speaking to anyone in the food movement—concluding that there isn’t much of a food movement after all, and most people don’t really care about labeling genetically engineered foods (GMOs).
Her sources? A two-year-old survey, another survey conducted by a food-industry front group, and consumer research by the agrichemical industry’s public relations firm. Let’s take a closer look.
Latest USRTK In the News
A Terminally Ill Man’s Victory Against Monsanto Could Spell Disaster for the Agrochemical Juggernaut
Stephanie K. Baer, BuzzFeed News, August 16, 2018
Weedkiller Found in Dozens of Popular Oat-Based Breakfast Foods
Megan Cerullo, Daily News, August 15, 2018
Monsanto Roundup Cancer Lawsuit Raises Questions about EPA, Herbicides and Ethics
Nicole Karlis, Salon, August 9, 2018
Monsanto to Get Flooded with Thousands of Cancer-Related Lawsuits
Jade Scipioni, FOX Business, July 11, 2018
Monsanto’s Ghostwriting and Strong-arming Threaten Sound Science—and Society
Sheldon Krimsky, Environmental Health News, June 26, 2018