Stacy Malkan, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, February 4, 2016
A few months ago, I raised concerns about Washington Post food columnist Tamar Haspel (FAIR.org,10/28/15) after she admitted taking money from agribusiness interest groups that she covers.
I pointed out that her columns are biased in favor of those industry groups, particularly on the topic of GMOs, even though her column is presented to readers as an unbiased effort to find middle ground in debates about our food system.
My article was met with crickets of silence from Haspel, her Post editor Joe Yonan and the band of biotech promoters who prolifically praise Haspel on Twitter. I figured that, soon enough, Haspel might write another column that would warrant raising the concerns another notch up the pole. She didn’t disappoint.
In her January column (Washington Post, 1/26/16), Haspel offered an investigation (“the surprising truth”) about the food movement—without speaking to anyone in the food movement—concluding that there isn’t much of a food movement after all, and most people don’t really care about labeling genetically engineered foods (GMOs).
Her sources? A two-year-old survey, another survey conducted by a food-industry front group, and consumer research by the agrichemical industry’s public relations firm. Let’s take a closer look.
Latest USRTK In the News
Is Something Fishy Going on Between the University of Florida and the Agrichemical Industry? Consumers Have a Right to Know
Daniel Ross, AlterNet, February 13, 2018
Zo gaan de spindoctors van Monsanto te werk
Vincent Harmsen, OneWorld, February 5, 2018
The pharmaceutical industry is no stranger to fake news
Paul Thacker, STAT News, January 30, 2018
Monsanto’s Fingerprints All Over Newsweek’s Opinion Piece, a Hit on Organic Food
Stacy Malkan, EcoWatch, January 24, 2018
EPA Says Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer, Contradicting IARC
Lorraine Chow, EcoWatch, December 19, 2017