Stacy Malkan, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, February 4, 2016
A few months ago, I raised concerns about Washington Post food columnist Tamar Haspel (FAIR.org,10/28/15) after she admitted taking money from agribusiness interest groups that she covers.
I pointed out that her columns are biased in favor of those industry groups, particularly on the topic of GMOs, even though her column is presented to readers as an unbiased effort to find middle ground in debates about our food system.
My article was met with crickets of silence from Haspel, her Post editor Joe Yonan and the band of biotech promoters who prolifically praise Haspel on Twitter. I figured that, soon enough, Haspel might write another column that would warrant raising the concerns another notch up the pole. She didn’t disappoint.
In her January column (Washington Post, 1/26/16), Haspel offered an investigation (“the surprising truth”) about the food movement—without speaking to anyone in the food movement—concluding that there isn’t much of a food movement after all, and most people don’t really care about labeling genetically engineered foods (GMOs).
Her sources? A two-year-old survey, another survey conducted by a food-industry front group, and consumer research by the agrichemical industry’s public relations firm. Let’s take a closer look.
Latest USRTK In the News
Rounding Up the Risks of Big Ag
Elana Conis, Los Angeles Review of Books, May 6, 2018
Cancer-Causing Weedkiller Found in Popular Foods, FDA Internal Email Reveals
Ariel Scotti, New York Daily News, April 30, 2018
Pesticide Linked to Cancer Is in Nearly Every US Food: Report
Lia Eustachewich, New York Post, April 30, 2018
Glyphosate Detected in Granola and Crackers, FDA Emails Show
Lorraine Chow, EcoWatch, April 30, 2018
Coca-Cola’s “War” With the Public Health Community
Gary Ruskin, Environmental Health News, April 3, 2018